A review of the plaintiff’s personnel file confirmed this.” No disciplinary actions or charges had ever been made by the District concerning the plaintiff, including gender/age-related harassment. 26, 2016, plaintiff and defendant Manheim Township School District executed a separation agreement and plaintiff left his employment in exchange for financial consideration. Nonetheless, because of the bad faith exhibited by all defendants toward plaintiff, on Jan. Plaintiff had always maintained his innocence and continues to do so. “Internal and external investigations were conducted and all of the allegations were deemed to be without merit. Following plaintiff’s employment and for the remainder of same, all defendants initiated and perpetuated false claims of gender-based and age-based harassment leveled at plaintiff,” the suit says. When plaintiff became Superintendent in 2014, plaintiff initiated an entry plan to account for numerous perceived issues of dysfunction, including but not limited to, a $1.6 million budget shortfall passed by the School Board. “On July 1, 2014, plaintiff became Superintendent of defendant Manheim Township School District. John Nodecker of North Wales filed suit in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas on June 2 versus Donna Prokay of Mount Joy, Bill Murry, Mark Anderson and Manheim Township School District of Lancaster, Kathy Setlock of Landisville, plus John/Jane Does 1-3.
LANCASTER – The former Superintendent of Manheim Township School District claims he was the subject of baseless allegations of gender and age-based harassment leveled against him by other employees of the District.
0 kommentar(er)
